Which approach aligns with clear logical comparisons in writing?

The approach that aligns with clear logical comparisons in writing is to directly name the subjects being compared. By explicitly stating the subjects involved in the comparison, the writer ensures that the reader clearly understands what is being analyzed or contrasted. This clarity prevents ambiguity and enhances the reader's comprehension of the relationships between the subjects.

When subjects are directly named, it eliminates confusion and allows for a more straightforward understanding of the similarities and differences being drawn. This method is particularly effective in persuasive writing, analytical essays, and any context where precise clarity is needed to convey complex ideas or arguments.

In contrast, stating one subject followed by an unrelated subject may lead to confusion, as the connection between them is not made explicit. While using analogies can be useful for illustrating complex ideas, they can also introduce a level of abstraction that may obscure the direct comparison if not done carefully. Focusing solely on one subject at a time might provide clarity, but it does not facilitate a direct comparison between multiple subjects, which is essential when making logical relations clear.